January 10th, 2012
Bob Prechter and his Elliott Wave newsletters never fail to intrigue me. Over the years, I’ve tried to understand the basic concepts behind Elliott Waves and Fibonacci wave counting but to no avail. I just don’t get it. Even more, I don’t get why there are so many people who fall for what to me sounds like one of the best marketing gimmicks and, dare I say, scams. To me it’s not any better than snake oil salesmen out west in the 1880’s or circus barkers in the 1930’s.
I signed up for his free emails just to see whether he was selling anything new and find that there’s a veritable unlimited supply of gullible and desperate investors. For example, a recent letter entitled “The Market is Forming Its ‘Biggest Head and Shoulders Top Ever’: Prechter” includes the following chart:
“This shows the Dow Industrial Average going back to 1980. It has formed the biggest head and shoulders top that I think has ever existed in any stock market…we’re now heading downward from this formation.” Since 2000, the stock market has been in a topping process. Eleven years may seem like a long time for a market to “top,” but consider how long the 1980s / ’90s bull market was. It takes time for that market optimism to dissipate.
I’ll say it takes a long time! Almost two years ago, in a post entitled “S&P Index at 3000 by 2020“, I wrote:
“I don’t know how many of you saw all the exposure Bob Prechter of Elliott Wave fame been recently getting (he even made the Sunday NY Times Business Section front page). Prechter, true to form as a perma-bear, reinstated his call for the next leg of this Crash to resume predicting it will be on a par with the 1929-32 Big One with the Dow-30, currently at 10198, “likely to fall well below 1,000 over perhaps five or six years as a grand market cycle comes to an end.” But he’s been calling for a decline on that order of magnitude for what seems like years.”
Well, the Dow Jones closed today at 12462, or 22.2% higher than on July 13, 2010, when Prechter made the front page of the NY Times Business section. Coincidentally, that NY Times piece appeared almost at the precise launch of the market’s last huge 27.9% run between August 31, 2010 and May 2, 2011.
Rather than joining Prechter’s bear camp then, I went the other direction with the view that we were (and still are) in a period very similar to the end of the last secular bear market in 1977-1982 … a view that’s more widely held and written about today than it was in 2010 when I seemed to be alone with that opinion. My view then was and today still is:
“I’ve modeled a recovery from a similar low in the current Crash (March 2009) to where the S&P 500 Index might be in 2020 if it were to follow an identical path to the one it followed from 1975 when the Index last touched the lower boundary. If the market were able to climb out of this secular bear market in a manner similar to the path out of the 1970’s one, then the S&P 500 Index could hit – are you sitting down – 3000 in 2020.”
and included the following chart:
Is Prechter correct in saying that the market is at the end of the topping process that began 10 years ago or is it the beginning of the march to 3000 by 2020? If anything, Prechter [like Cramer] is often a very reliable contra-indicator. The time he’s most bearish (if degrees to his perpetual bearishness is possible at all) is the time that the market on the very of a huge bullish move.
I you were smart, you wouldn’t have bought patent medicines or believed the acts in a carnival freakshow. Let’s hope you don’t fall for this perma-bear sideshow and that Prechter’s new call for a market top turns about to be another contra-indication.