February 23rd, 2012
If you’ve explored this site you’ve learned that one of the benefits of a membership is access to Watchlists, lists of stocks culled from the 7000 or so publicly-traded stocks by way of scans whereby all stocks are filtered against combinations of different financial and technical parameters and by my visually scanning hundreds of stock charts for potential breakout potential.
One of my favorite scans is called “Stocks on the Move”, a filter that focuses on parameters defining outstanding fundamental operating plus strong technical performance. I developed this scan a number of years ago while attempting to replicate similar lists published in Investors’ Business Daily. My scan was modeled after IBD’s and frequently delivers many of the same names.
A subscriber wrote the other day asking whether I’d “performed any regression analysis to ascertain the relative predictability of these parameters?” I had to confess I hadn’t performed any rigorous analysis and realized that I should …. for the benefit of both my subscribers and myself.
I had twice posted the results of “Stocks on the Move” scans (July 22, 2009 and March 2, 2010 ) and I made the most recent list available exclusive to subscribers on January 6, 2012. But the question remains: on a back-tested basis how reliable were these scans? If you had selected stocks from any of these three lists, what’s the probability that they would shown a gain? outperformed the S&P 500? would the performance be any different 100 days, 200 days, 300 days or 500 days in the future?
Some might argue that this is a limited sample but I believe it’s indicative of the potency of “Stocks on the Move” as a reliable source of investment ideas with a low risk and high probability of outperforming the benchmark. Of the 7000+ stocks the scan picked up the following stocks more than once and all together 358 different stocks:
The back testing was performed at intervals of approximately 100 trading days after when the scans were run against 2 measures: absolute performance and performance vs. the benchmark S&P 500 Index over the same periods. Interestingly:
- Stocks filtered out in the scans run on both days, more than 50% of the stocks filtered out by the scan appreciated above the price on the day of the scan for 300 or more trading days into the future (of the S&P 500 Index, half perform better than the Index itself by definition).
- More than 60% of those stocks also outperformed the S&P 500 far after the Scan was run however that better than average performance occurred primarily shortly after the scan run date; by approximately after the end of the first year, those stocks no longer showed superior relative performance.
Become a member now and you’ll have access to the archive of all the Watchlists, the Weekly Reports, the Model Portfolios and all the Instant Alerts since November to help you navigate this market as it moves higher.